The case involved a costs dispute following a sanction hearing for a Scheme of Arrangement related to Highland Crusader Fund II Ltd. The Petitioner sought indemnity costs, arguing that UBS (the Objector) had opposed the scheme solely for commercial advantage. The Objector contended that its opposition raised legitimate issues and that costs should not be awarded against it. The Court had to determine whether the Objector?s participation justified costs or if it should bear expenses due to its opposition.

Flood pleaded guilty to causing grievous bodily harm by driving without due care resulting in an obligatory 2 years disqualification

Attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder charges following a shooting incident; reliance on circumstantial evidence and witness testimony; judge's ruling of no case to answer

Cheyra Bell employed as a Residential Care Officer was dismissed for gross misconduct due to being under the influence of alcohol; she appealed the decision challenging the disciplinary process

Whether the Supreme Court correctly allowed judgment against the Appellant based on the arbitration award

Joint property ownership petitioner seeking property sale respondent opposing sale

After their father's death siblings dispute over property sale and division of proceeds; claimant seeks reimbursement for renovations

Company

Kim Bird filed an application for costs against the 5th Respondent, Francyna Bennette, arguing that costs should follow the event in a partition action regarding the sale of co-owned property. The Court found that while the usual rule of costs following the event does not strictly apply to partition actions, Bennette?s delays and obstruction contributed to legal expenses. The Court granted Bird 50% of her costs.

The case concerns an application by the Minister for the termination of arbitration proceedings commenced by the Respondents under the Municipalities Amendment Act 2013 seeking compensation from the Government of Bermuda arising from the voiding of agreements with the Corporation of Hamilton in December 2013. Despite directions and a scheduled hearing the Respondents failed to effectively participate citing a lack of funds

The case examines the clash between newly protected rights against discrimination based on sexual orientation and older rights of freedom of conscience and expression in the context of a referendum on same-sex marriage and civil unions. It highlights Bermuda's historical struggle with human rights leading to the 1981 Human Rights Act amendment to include sexual orientation. The Government's failure to appeal the Bermuda Bred Company case led to a referendum contested for potentially undermining protected human rights.

Plaintiff an Austrian citizen seeks judicial review for refusal of Permanent Resident's Certificate (PRC) by Minister and Cabinet claiming appeal process was unconstitutional