top of page

1/7/2015

START DATE

END DATE

29-Sep-15

Mary Charlene Butterfield v Charles Eugene Brangman Chimene Derise Anderson Luke Albert Joshua Hill

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

Real Estate Family Law

Hellman J

Bruce Swan (Apex Law Group Ltd)

Larry Mussenden (Mussenden Subair Limited) Vaughan V Caines (Marc Geoffrey Ltd)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

After their father's death siblings dispute over property sale and division of proceeds; claimant seeks reimbursement for renovations

SUMMARY:

Determining reasonable costs for renovations and reimbursement

OUTCOMES:

Butterfield awarded costs for renovations legal fees and miscellaneous expenses less insurance money received. Anderson and Hill also awarded certain claims.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Butterfield (for renovation costs) Anderson (for labour costs) Hill (for construction and miscellaneous expenses)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Mary Charlene Butterfield v Charles Eugene Brangman Chimene Derise Anderson Luke Albert Joshua Hill

After their father's death siblings dispute over property sale and division of proceeds; claimant seeks reimbursement for renovations

bottom of page