Brangman convicted of sexual exploitation and carnal knowledge of his stepdaughter sentences appealed

Mallory pleaded guilty to wounding with intent; incident at Place s Place Bar; victim stabbed in chest hospitalized and suffered long-term impact

The petitioner sought to restore Bermuda Composite Construction Ltd to the register after it was struck off in 2004. The restoration was granted but the application to suspend the limitation period was contested by affected parties

Legal interpretation of segregated accounts application of assets and liabilities

Dispute over the right to present a winding-up petition based on statutory demands interpretation of Facility Agreement majority lenders' rights versus individual enforcement action

Plaintiff's investment not returned or misappropriated defendants' failure to enter an appearance

Plaintiffs claim damages for breach of contractual and/or tortious duties by the Bank in selling shares before a dividend was paid resulting in a loss of $176559

The case involves the Official Receiver's request for leave to summon persons related to the bankrupt Julian Hall for examinations under section 29 of the Bankruptcy Act 1989 and to defer filing the report required by section 32 of the Act. The matter is notable for its duration extending over nine years since Hall was adjudged bankrupt on 26th January 2000. Despite previous exchanges and a section 32 hearing no examinations under section 29 have been held and a section 32 report has yet to be filed following a directions hearing on 20th August 2008 and a subsequent hearing on 3rd November 2008.

Unmarried same-sex couple seeking to jointly adopt a child denied due to marital status challenges the legality under Adoption Act 2006 and Human Rights Act 1981

Ancillary relief proceedings following divorce disputed assets valuation and costs petitioner's entitlement to financial provision

Marriage dissolution financial contributions property interests

Dispute over defendant's decision not to take up an assignment of plaintiff?s lease due to a decline in rental values and whether the defendant was entitled to terminate the agreement based on the 'Condition Date' not occurring before December 31 2009