top of page

1/5/2009

START DATE

END DATE

19-Jan-09

In the Matter of Julian Ernest Sinclair Phillips Hall

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

Bankruptcy

Hon. Carlisle Greaves

Paul Harshaw

Not listed

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The case involves the Official Receiver's request for leave to summon persons related to the bankrupt Julian Hall for examinations under section 29 of the Bankruptcy Act 1989 and to defer filing the report required by section 32 of the Act. The matter is notable for its duration extending over nine years since Hall was adjudged bankrupt on 26th January 2000. Despite previous exchanges and a section 32 hearing no examinations under section 29 have been held and a section 32 report has yet to be filed following a directions hearing on 20th August 2008 and a subsequent hearing on 3rd November 2008.

SUMMARY:

Whether the Official Receiver should be granted leave to summon individuals for examination under section 29 and defer filing the section 32 report

OUTCOMES:

The judge decided it was not reasonable to grant the orders sought due to potential further delays except for allowing a final period of fourteen days for the Official Receiver to file his section 32 report.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Official Receiver

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

In the Matter of Julian Ernest Sinclair Phillips Hall

The case involves the Official Receiver's request for leave to summon persons related to the bankrupt Julian Hall for examinations under section 29 of the Bankruptcy Act 1989 and to defer filing the report required by section 32 of the Act. The matter is notable for its duration extending over nine years since Hall was adjudged bankrupt on 26th January 2000. Despite previous exchanges and a section 32 hearing no examinations under section 29 have been held and a section 32 report has yet to be filed following a directions hearing on 20th August 2008 and a subsequent hearing on 3rd November 2008.

bottom of page