summary of Dispute over land tax payable for the property known as ?Gatewood? owned by Banks based on the Director?s assessment

Long marriage of over thirty years separation in August 2015 Decree Nisi on 27 July 2018 made absolute on 18 September 2018 dispute over the Georgia Property's ownership renovations and mortgage payments for the former matrimonial home (FMH) Husband's application for ancillary relief Wife's reliance on affidavits for claims HS's involvement and claim over the Georgia Property pension equalization issue outstanding debts including Renovation Debts Sub-Zero Debt Construction Loan

Burgess and Robinson convicted of murdering Jahmil and Jahmal Cooper appealed convictions and sentences. Eyewitness and forensic evidence linked them to the crime. Appeals focused on alleged judicial bias police misconduct and disclosure failures.

The case involves alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and misuse of confidential information by defendants in the context of corporate affairs and arbitration proceedings

Charges included intrusion upon privacy and sexual assault; Charlton's conviction was based on a sexual assault charge; appeal involved discussion on the impact of prescription medications and cannabis as well as psychiatric evaluations suggesting a manic episode influenced by these substances

The facts center around Clemons a teacher experiencing exacerbation of hypertension due to a breach of duty by the Minister of Education providing a safe work environment. Claims of intentional harm and broader psychological injuries including PTSD were not proven. Clemons won on negligence related to workplace conditions causing physical health issues but not on claims related to psychological harm or intentional infliction of harm. The court ruled in favor of Clemons for negligence but dismissed her claim for intentional infliction of harm

Claim for damages due to personal injuries from a road traffic collision on 9th March 2011

Jahmeekah Wilson, a civilian data entry clerk at the Bermuda Police Service, was convicted of corruption for withdrawing 79 parking tickets, some of which belonged to her sister, in exchange for money. She initially pled not guilty but later changed her plea during trial. The Magistrates? Court sentenced her to fines, but the prosecution appealed, arguing that imprisonment was the only appropriate sentence for public corruption.

Plaintiff convicted of murder granted parole then recalled to prison on suspicion of new offense. Argues procedural impropriety and breach of constitutional rights for fair hearing

Mandatory quarantine for unvaccinated travellers at their own cost does not breach fundamental right to freedom of movement if measures are reasonably required for public health

Ms. Junos appealed for her appointment to continue indefinitely until the foundation became independent claiming entitlement to full salary up to 19th February 2009

Dispute over maintenance payments after changes in circumstances. Husband sought reduction emphasizing change in mortgage payments and children's education status. Initially set as child maintenance ambiguity arose whether payments were also for spousal support. Wife's greater earnings noted but payments treated as partly spousal maintenance. Maintenance adjusted with children's changing educational needs. Appeal highlighted confusion in original orders lack of clarity in judge's ruling and need for precise determination in maintenance categorization