Whether impugned statements made by the 1st Applicant offensive to persons of European descent and homosexuals cross the boundaries of constitutionally protected free speech into legally unprotected ?hate speech?

Wife awarded $305000 child maintenance set

Appeal against care orders for two children J and R under Section 25 of the Children?s Act 1998 by the Director of Child and Family Services due to concerns over parenting capacity and medical treatment compliance

Dispute over land conveyance possession and rights of way leading to multiple claims and a complex legal history

Dispute over land ownership of Lot 11 42 Dunscombe Road Warwick

summary of Dwight Lambert sought declaration that the Obscene Publications Act 1973 was unconstitutional due to its vague definition of obscenity potentially infringing on rights to a fair trial and freedom of expression

Review of decisions related to teacher/principal transfers and establishment of Parent Councils

Shareholder battle for control of CY Foundation failure to convene 2010 Annual General Meeting (AGM) legal proceedings surrounding the legitimacy and accuracy of the company's 09/10 Financial Statements involvement of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Hong Kong arrest and investigation of key individuals

Plaintiff alleged breach of trust against the Trustee in relation to information/documentation provision care in managing a specific trust asset and fees/disbursements

The case involves charges against the defendant Sabian Hayward and co-accused Daymon Simmons for possession with intent to supply cocaine and cannabis resin. The court originally granted an ex parte application for a voluntary bill of indictment which was later contested and required re-examination. The matter was complicated by procedural issues and statutory interpretations between old and new legal frameworks regarding the preferment of indictments.

Legal and factual challenges to the receivership order by Teyseer joint debts and beneficial ownership of contract revenues

Dessarollo a Mexican real estate company sought to enforce an Arizona Court judgment against Kader Holdings a Bermudian company based on a guarantee linked to a lease agreement. Kader Holdings challenged the Arizona Court's jurisdiction and lost then fully contested the case on merits. The Supreme Court of Bermuda ruled in favor of enforcing the Arizona judgment finding Kader Holdings had voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of the Arizona Court by contesting both jurisdiction and merits