Dispute over costs following a ruling on applications with the defendant Clearwater Development Limited seeking a significant portion of costs. The court had to decide on the appropriate allocation of costs between the parties taking into account the outcomes of various applications and the overarching principle that costs should generally follow the event

Plaintiffs claim against CS Life for losses from unauthorised imprudent and fraudulent trading on accounts seeking damages for breached duties

Dispute over share transfer and rectification of share register in a joint venture for a power project

Failure by Regulatory Authority to complete telecommunications sector market review within time limit limited declaratory relief granted

Prison officer dismissed for possessing unauthorized cell phone in sensitive prison area challenged disciplinary decisions on grounds of harshness and disproportionality questioned procedural fairness and legal representation rights

The case centered on the wrongful retention by Richardson of Meens? commercial goods and counterclaims for renovation costs. Meens? claim in conversion was proved leading to an order for the return of goods and damages to be assessed. Richardson?s counterclaim for renovation costs was partially allowed. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs due to Meens' unreasonable conduct in litigation.

Viability of restructuring creditor support for adjournment progress in restructuring efforts required

Farnworth convicted for using iPod while riding a motorcycle appealed on grounds that iPod not a hand-held device and her actions did not constitute prohibited use

Disagreement over the scope of discovery for the appraisal of the fair value of the shares held by the Dissenting Shareholders

Married in 2009 divorce decree absolute pronounced in August 2017 dispute over former matrimonial home purchased in 2010 with contributions from both parties and the petitioner's parents ancillary relief sought for child maintenance lump sum and property adjustment

Montpelier Reinsurance Ltd. sought a court-appointed arbitrator after the contractual process for selecting a third arbitrator in a reinsurance dispute broke down. The arbitration agreement contained a clause requiring the third arbitrator to be selected either by mutual agreement or through a lot-drawing mechanism. Montpelier argued that the lot-drawing mechanism had failed, while MPCL insisted that it should have been enforced. The Court had to determine whether it had jurisdiction to directly appoint an arbitrator.

Three applicants members of Bermudians against the Draft refuse military service as conscientious objectors treated differently due to their beliefs and public stance against conscription underwent various forms of mistreatment and legal challenges arrested and detained for failing to comply with military service orders