January 26 2018

START DATE

END DATE

January 26 2018

In the Matter of Up Energy Development Group Limited and In the Matter of the Companies Act 1981

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

Commercial Court

IAN RC KAWALEY CJ

John Wasty and Hannah Tildesley for the Petitioner Kevin Taylor and Nicole Tovey for the Joint Provisional Liquidators Andrew Martin and Jennifer Haworth for Kaisun Mark Burrows for Baosteel

Adjournment

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Viability of restructuring creditor support for adjournment progress in restructuring efforts required

SUMMARY:

Adjournment granted

OUTCOMES:

In Favour Of adjournment and restructuring efforts

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

October 13 2017

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary:

AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies