Case Summaries

Smith claimed damages for breach of contract and extortion after the bank denied him a contract and attempted to repossess a vehicle. He filed for damages of $1500000. The bank argued the claim was frivolous and should be struck out.

Dispute over entitlement of retiring partners to Capital Contributions under partnership agreements

BS&R Group Limited filed a lawsuit against Stephen West for breach of contract in carpentry services. The case evolved to question the legal entity of Westport Architecture claimed to be a partnership between Stephen West and his son Tripp West impacting the correct defendant status.

Appellant challenges Board's appointment due to bias judicial review denied by Chief Justice but allowed by Court of Appeal on appeal

Children wrongfully retained in Bermuda by father mother's application for return to USA under Hague Convention children's objections considered

Athene claims Siddiqui and Cernich misused confidential information for Caldera's benefit violating fiduciary confidence and contractual duties

Appellant convicted of the brutal murder of two elderly homeless men attacked at night one victim set on fire post-mortem another stabbed thirteen times. Appellant's actions described as gratuitous with confessions suggesting a motive to experience killing.

Slaughters claimed a right of way over Moulder's land based on purchase from Michael Cranfield and historical use

The case revolves around the insolvency and winding-up petition against Gerova Financial Group Limited by Maxim LLC based on an unpaid debt evidenced by a promissory note. The court had to consider whether Maxim having sold its debt collection rights to Aramid Entertainment Fund Ltd. under an Agency Agreement maintained sufficient interest in the proceedings. The court found Maxim to be an unpaid creditor with standing entitled to a winding-up order on the grounds of inability to pay its debt notwithstanding the complex background of commercial disputes and alleged collateral purposes behind the petition.

The Appellant was convicted alongside his brother for wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm and having a bladed or pointed object in a public place. The brother later admitted responsibility and supported the Appellant's appeal.

Dispute over a $18000000 bridging loan agreement for Par-La-Ville Hotel project breach of contract and escrow agreement misappropriation of funds by defendants

Summary of Facts Issues Outcomes InFavourOf: Not explicitly stated in the accessed part of the document