top of page

11/5/2010

START DATE

END DATE

11/5/2010

Harold Darrell v The Board of Inquiry

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Court of Appeal for Bermuda

Civil Law

Zacca President Evans JA Auld JA

Mr. M. Beloff QC Mr. L. Scott

Not listed

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Appellant challenges Board's appointment due to bias judicial review denied by Chief Justice but allowed by Court of Appeal on appeal

SUMMARY:

Validity of Board's appointment denial and later permission for judicial review

OUTCOMES:

Appeal allowed judicial review granted

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Appellant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Harold Darrell v The Board of Inquiry

Appellant challenges Board's appointment due to bias judicial review denied by Chief Justice but allowed by Court of Appeal on appeal

bottom of page