top of page

4/13/2017

START DATE

END DATE

8/11/2021

Titan Petrochemicals Group Limited v. Sino Charm International Limited

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Court of Appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from Supreme Court of Bermuda

Commercial Law

THE PRESIDENT SIR CHRISTOPHER CLARKE JUSTICE OF APPEAL GEOFFREY BELL JUSTICE OF APPEAL SIR ANTHONY SMELLIE

Alexander Potts QC and Rhys Williams

Steven White and John McSweeney Kehinde George for the 5th Interested Party

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Titan failed to honor bond payments to Sino Charm leading to a winding-up petition based on alleged siphoned funds for bond purchase through fraudulent transactions

SUMMARY:

Validity of the bond issuance and alleged fraudulent transactions leading to winding-up petition

OUTCOMES:

Wound up under section 161(e) of the Companies Act 1981

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant (Sino Charm International Limited)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Titan Petrochemicals Group Limited v. Sino Charm International Limited

Titan failed to honor bond payments to Sino Charm leading to a winding-up petition based on alleged siphoned funds for bond purchase through fraudulent transactions

bottom of page