top of page

11/12/2014

START DATE

END DATE

7/24/2015

Minister of Finance vs. A Company

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

CIVIL JURISDICTION TAX LAW

Hellman J

David Kessaram Leighton Rochester Wayne Brown

Jeffrey Elkinson

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The case involved the failure of A Company to comply with a Production Order issued for tax information exchange under the 2005 Act. Plaintiff sought enforcement through a writ of sequestration.

SUMMARY:

Whether A Company was in contempt of court for not complying with the Production Order.

OUTCOMES:

The Company was found in breach of the Order but had substantially complied by the time of the ruling. Costs were awarded to the Plaintiff.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff/Claimant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Minister of Finance vs. A Company

The case involved the failure of A Company to comply with a Production Order issued for tax information exchange under the 2005 Act. Plaintiff sought enforcement through a writ of sequestration.

bottom of page