top of page

3 February 2014

START DATE

END DATE

7-Feb-14

MFP-2000 LP v Viking Capital Limited & Misa Investments Limited

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

COMMERCIAL COURT CIVIL JURISDICTION

Hellman J

John Brisby QC Delroy Duncan Nicole Tovey

Narinder Hargun Christian Luthi

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Viking Capital & Misa intended to acquire MFP-2000?s shares in Viking River Cruises Limited; issued a section 103 notice; before acquisition sold all shares to Viking Cruises Ltd raising issue whether they could still acquire MFP-2000's shares

SUMMARY:

Whether holders of more than 95% shares retain right to acquire remaining shares if their shareholding drops below 95% before acquisition

OUTCOMES:

Court ruled in favor of respondents holding they remain entitled to acquire shares at price fixed by court despite no longer holding 95% share

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

MFP-2000 LP v Viking Capital Limited & Misa Investments Limited

Viking Capital & Misa intended to acquire MFP-2000?s shares in Viking River Cruises Limited; issued a section 103 notice; before acquisition sold all shares to Viking Cruises Ltd raising issue whether they could still acquire MFP-2000's shares

bottom of page