top of page

1/11/2011

START DATE

END DATE

12/4/2013

Gianni Vigilante v. Christopher Trott

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

CIVIL JURISDICTION

Hellman J

Craig Rothwell (Plaintiff)

Simone N Smith-Bean (Defendant)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Vigilante loaned Trott $200000 Trott allegedly signed a promissory note conflict of evidence and missing note

SUMMARY:

Validity of the promissory note loan repayment

OUTCOMES:

Defendant ordered to pay $200000 to Plaintiff

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Gianni Vigilante v. Christopher Trott

Vigilante loaned Trott $200000 Trott allegedly signed a promissory note conflict of evidence and missing note

bottom of page