Augu 17 24 2012
START DATE
END DATE
September 7 2012
Fiona Miller v. Joshua Crockwell and Joshua Crockwell v. Fiona Miller
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
The Supreme Court of Bermuda Appellate Jurisdiction
Criminal Law Sexual Exploitation
N/A
Elizabeth Christopher
Susan Mulligan
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The respondent was convicted of sexual exploitation of a girl under 14 in June 2010. The sentence of 15 months' imprisonment was suspended for two years with probation. The appeal involved admissibility of verbal statements made by the defendant upon arrest and the reasoning behind the magistrate's decision
SUMMARY:
Issues regarding admissibility of evidence the reasoning behind the magistrate?s findings and whether the sentence imposed was adequate
OUTCOMES:
Appeal against conviction dismissed appeal against sentence dismissed
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Defendant for the conviction appeal Plaintiff/Claimant for the sentence appeal
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
Fiona Miller v. Joshua Crockwell and Joshua Crockwell v. Fiona Miller
The respondent was convicted of sexual exploitation of a girl under 14 in June 2010. The sentence of 15 months' imprisonment was suspended for two years with probation. The appeal involved admissibility of verbal statements made by the defendant upon arrest and the reasoning behind the magistrate's decision