top of page

May 28 2012

START DATE

END DATE

June 1 2012

Lyndon Raynor v. Stanley Eugene Davis

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

Criminal Law

Ian R.C. Kawaley CJ

Susan Mulligan

Marc Daniels

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The respondent entered a hotel room intending to steal struggled with the occupants claimed to have a gun and escaped. His criminal history includes numerous non-violent property offences driven by drug addiction. The magistrate sentenced him to 1 year deemed inadequate on appeal due to the seriousness of the crime the offender's history and the need for a sentence that deters similar offences. The sentence was increased to 2 ? years

SUMMARY:

Whether the initial 1-year sentence was manifestly inadequate for a burglary offence committed in a hotel involving elderly victims and whether a more severe sentence was necessary to reflect the seriousness of the crime and the offender's history

OUTCOMES:

The initial sentence was increased to 2 ? years on appeal

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff/Claimant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Lyndon Raynor v. Stanley Eugene Davis

The respondent entered a hotel room intending to steal struggled with the occupants claimed to have a gun and escaped. His criminal history includes numerous non-violent property offences driven by drug addiction. The magistrate sentenced him to 1 year deemed inadequate on appeal due to the seriousness of the crime the offender's history and the need for a sentence that deters similar offences. The sentence was increased to 2 ? years

bottom of page