November 22 2010
START DATE
END DATE
July 22 2011
F v. F (Re: Maintenance Pending Suit)
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
The Supreme Court of Bermuda
DIVORCE JURISDICTION
KAWALEY J
Georgia Marshall (Marshall Diel & Myers) for the Petitioner
David Kessaram (Cox Hallett Wilkinson) for the Respondent
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The case revolves around the Wife's application for maintenance pending suit amidst a background of the Husband forming a new relationship and litigation affecting family assets. The Wife requested interim ancillary relief and the case involves extensive affidavits and exhibits from both parties touching on matters of discovery trust situs changes and unauthorized document acquisition.
SUMMARY:
The key issues involve the assessment of the Husband's means the Wife's living expenses and the inclusion of legal costs in the maintenance pending suit.
OUTCOMES:
The court ordered the Husband to pay $20000 per month towards the Wife's legal costs (totaling $80000 for the past 4 months) and $32000 per month henceforth for living and legal expenses.
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff/Claimant
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
F v. F (Re: Maintenance Pending Suit)
The case revolves around the Wife's application for maintenance pending suit amidst a background of the Husband forming a new relationship and litigation affecting family assets. The Wife requested interim ancillary relief and the case involves extensive affidavits and exhibits from both parties touching on matters of discovery trust situs changes and unauthorized document acquisition.