25-26 October 2010
START DATE
END DATE
26-Nov-10
A.A. v A.S.
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
The Supreme Court of Bermuda
DIVORCE JURISDICTION
The Hon. Justice Norma Wade-Miller
Lomas & Co. (for the Petitioner)
Respondent in person
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The case involves a divorce where the petitioner seeks periodical payments and a lump sum for herself and the child. The marriage lasted about 4 years with issues surrounding employment financial contributions and care of the child. The husband's inherited property and a house in Ethiopia are the primary assets. The husband has not been gainfully employed and owes legal fees.
SUMMARY:
The division of assets periodical payments and care for the child's welfare.
OUTCOMES:
The court orders the husband to pay a lump sum of $55000 to the wife periodical payments of $2300 per month for the wife and child and restricts the husband from further borrowing against the Bermuda property. A clean break was considered inappropriate due to the short marriage and the need to provide for the child.
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff/Claimant
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
A.A. v A.S.
The case involves a divorce where the petitioner seeks periodical payments and a lump sum for herself and the child. The marriage lasted about 4 years with issues surrounding employment financial contributions and care of the child. The husband's inherited property and a house in Ethiopia are the primary assets. The husband has not been gainfully employed and owes legal fees.