top of page

14-Jun-10

START DATE

END DATE

7/5/2010

Kate Ransom Wilson Grayken v. John Patrick Grayken

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

Civil Law Family Law

Richard Ground

Alan Dunch

Paul Smith

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Plaintiff sought amendments to include causes of action in fraudulent misrepresentation negligent misrepresentation mistake and breach of contract regarding the classification of an asset Tsunami I in a divorce settlement agreement. The defendant argued these new causes were statute-barred

SUMMARY:

Issues of misrepresentation and classification of assets in divorce settlement amendments sought for including new causes of action were found statute-barred except for loss flowing from original cause

OUTCOMES:

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Kate Ransom Wilson Grayken v. John Patrick Grayken

Plaintiff sought amendments to include causes of action in fraudulent misrepresentation negligent misrepresentation mistake and breach of contract regarding the classification of an asset Tsunami I in a divorce settlement agreement. The defendant argued these new causes were statute-barred

bottom of page