top of page

24-Nov-09

START DATE

END DATE

19-Jan-10

THE QUEEN - and - DARRONTE LAVAR DILL

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

Hon. Chief Justice Richard Ground

The DPP Mr. Mahoney and Ms. Sofianos

Ms. Weekes QC and Mr. Woolridge

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Dill was convicted of the murders of Maxwell Brangman and Frederick Gilbert. Brangman was found burned in a shed, while Gilbert was discovered floating in Smith?s Sound. The evidence included confessions Dill allegedly made to a fellow prisoner, recorded police interviews, and forensic evidence. The defense challenged the admissibility of these confessions, arguing they were obtained under duress and should be excluded under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 2006 (PACE).

SUMMARY:

(1) Were Dill?s confessions obtained under duress? (2) Did the police use unfair tactics to extract the confessions? (3) Should the recorded evidence have been excluded?

OUTCOMES:

Conviction upheld; confessions deemed admissible.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

The Crown (Plaintiff)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

THE QUEEN - and - DARRONTE LAVAR DILL

Dill was convicted of the murders of Maxwell Brangman and Frederick Gilbert. Brangman was found burned in a shed, while Gilbert was discovered floating in Smith?s Sound. The evidence included confessions Dill allegedly made to a fellow prisoner, recorded police interviews, and forensic evidence. The defense challenged the admissibility of these confessions, arguing they were obtained under duress and should be excluded under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 2006 (PACE).

bottom of page