top of page

13-Oct-09

START DATE

END DATE

30-Oct-09

Antonio M. Fagundo v Island Cleaning Services

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

CIVIL JURISDICTION

Hon. Kawaley J

Mr. Jai Pachai & Ms. Margaret Burgess-Howie (Wakefield Quin)

Mr. Timothy Marshall & Mr. Kevin Taylor (Marshall Diel & Myers)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The Plaintiff, a Portuguese national, was employed by the Defendant as a cleaner. He claimed personal injury damages for an accident that occurred on September 2, 2000, when he slipped and fell while stripping wax from a floor. He alleged the accident was caused by the Defendant?s failure to provide proper safety footwear. The Defendant denied liability, arguing that the Plaintiff was responsible for his own footwear. The Court had to determine whether the employer was negligent and if the Plaintiff contributed to his injuries.

SUMMARY:

(1) Did the Defendant owe a duty of care to provide protective footwear? (2) Was the Plaintiff?s injury caused by the lack of safety shoes? (3) Did the Plaintiff contribute to his injuries?

OUTCOMES:

Employer found negligent; Plaintiff awarded damages; Contributory negligence assessed.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Antonio Marques Fagundo (Plaintiff)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Antonio M. Fagundo v Island Cleaning Services

The Plaintiff, a Portuguese national, was employed by the Defendant as a cleaner. He claimed personal injury damages for an accident that occurred on September 2, 2000, when he slipped and fell while stripping wax from a floor. He alleged the accident was caused by the Defendant?s failure to provide proper safety footwear. The Defendant denied liability, arguing that the Plaintiff was responsible for his own footwear. The Court had to determine whether the employer was negligent and if the Plaintiff contributed to his injuries.

bottom of page