top of page

19 July 2006

START DATE

END DATE

6 October 2008

The Bermuda Telephone Company Limited v The Minister of Telecommunications and E-Commerce

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

Telecommunications Law

Richard Ground

Jeffrey Elkinson and Ben Adamson of Conyers Dill & Pearman

Huw Shepheard of the Attorney General?s Chambers

FACTS OF THE CASE:

summary of BTC appealed against the Minister's decision to reduce the LAC from 5? per minute to 3? per minute claiming it would significantly reduce its revenue

SUMMARY:

Fairness of the appeal process due process in handling BTC's cost data reliance on comparator data from Colorado and approach to non-traffic sensitive costs

OUTCOMES:

The court found no procedural unfairness and could not say the decision of the Minister was plainly wrong. The appeal was dismissed

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

The Bermuda Telephone Company Limited v The Minister of Telecommunications and E-Commerce

summary of BTC appealed against the Minister's decision to reduce the LAC from 5? per minute to 3? per minute claiming it would significantly reduce its revenue

bottom of page