top of page

12/11/2006

START DATE

END DATE

3/31/2008

Dean O. Ming v. Richard Horseman et al.

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

Civil Jurisdiction

Hon. Geoffrey R. Bell

Plaintiff in Person

Mr. Jai Pachai Wakefield Quin

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Plaintiff sued defendants for alleged legal improprieties during divorce proceedings including defamation and misappropriation of funds

SUMMARY:

Defamation compliance with court orders perverting the course of justice misappropriation of funds

OUTCOMES:

Claims struck out

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendants

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Dean O. Ming v. Richard Horseman et al.

Plaintiff sued defendants for alleged legal improprieties during divorce proceedings including defamation and misappropriation of funds

bottom of page