top of page
October 15 2007
START DATE
END DATE
October 19 2007
M v. M (RE: M MK AND C-PERMANENT REMOVAL APPLICATION)
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Supreme Court of Bermuda
Divorce Jurisdiction
KAWALEY J
David Kessaram Cox Hallett Wilkinson for the Petitioner Saul Froomkin Q.C. Mello Jones & Martin for the Respondent
Ruling
FACTS OF THE CASE:
Mother's request for permanent removal of children to Canada granted father's custody challenge based on fraudulent Bermudian Status dismissed court's decision influenced by need to ensure children's welfare and mother's primary caregiving role
SUMMARY:
Plaintiff/Claimant
OUTCOMES:
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
AI Chatbox Anchor
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
bottom of page