Not Mentioned

START DATE

END DATE

2/19/2007

ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd. vs. Continental Casualty Company & Continental Insurance Company

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

Civil Jurisdiction

Richard Ground Chief Justice

N. Hargun

Not Mentioned

FACTS OF THE CASE:

ACE Bermuda issued insurance policy with arbitration clause to 3M Continental initiated action in Minnesota against 3M and insurers including ACE Bermuda

SUMMARY:

Enforcement of arbitration clause jurisdictional challenge

OUTCOMES:

Injunction granted to prevent Continental from proceeding with action in Minnesota against ACE Bermuda

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff (ACE Bermuda Insurance Ltd.)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary:

AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies