top of page

May 12 2017

START DATE

END DATE

June 13 2017

Clarien Bank Limited v. Elizabeth Cristina Pereira Vieira DaCosta Nancy Lynn Vieira

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

SUPREME COURT OF BERMUDA

CIVIL JURISDICTION

IAN RC KAWALEY CJ

Kai Musson Taylors (Defendant lawyer)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

On November 8 2016 Plaintiff obtained a Possession Order under a mortgage over property owned by the Defendants. The order was stayed until February 24 2017 for refinancing opportunities which failed. Defendants applied for a stay of execution on April 28 2017 and again on May 11 2017 for a further stay citing potential refinancing. The court found no jurisdictional basis for a non-consensual stay based on the Defendants' submissions.

SUMMARY:

Whether the court had jurisdiction to grant a stay of enforcement of a Possession Order without the mortgagee?s consent and if there was a reasonable prospect of the Defendants refinancing the mortgage.

OUTCOMES:

Application for stay of enforcement refused.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Clarien Bank Limited v. Elizabeth Cristina Pereira Vieira DaCosta Nancy Lynn Vieira

On November 8 2016 Plaintiff obtained a Possession Order under a mortgage over property owned by the Defendants. The order was stayed until February 24 2017 for refinancing opportunities which failed. Defendants applied for a stay of execution on April 28 2017 and again on May 11 2017 for a further stay citing potential refinancing. The court found no jurisdictional basis for a non-consensual stay based on the Defendants' submissions.

bottom of page