top of page

9/5/2019

START DATE

END DATE

1-Oct-19

THE QUEEN v. WILLIAM FRANKLYN SMITH

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

S. Subair Williams J

Ms. Maria Sofianos

Ms. Elizabeth Christopher

FACTS OF THE CASE:

William Franklyn Smith was convicted of attempted and actual unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 14 and sexual exploitation of a young person by a person in a position of trust. His bail applications pending sentence and appeal were refused due to the serious nature of the crimes and the likelihood of a custodial sentence exceeding three years

SUMMARY:

issues regarding bail application procedures and interpretation of legal principles surrounding bail for serious offences

OUTCOMES:

outcomes included the refusal of bail based on the seriousness of the offenses and pending custodial sentence

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

THE QUEEN v. WILLIAM FRANKLYN SMITH

William Franklyn Smith was convicted of attempted and actual unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 14 and sexual exploitation of a young person by a person in a position of trust. His bail applications pending sentence and appeal were refused due to the serious nature of the crimes and the likelihood of a custodial sentence exceeding three years

bottom of page