top of page

May 19 2016

START DATE

END DATE

February 6 2017

Sannapareddy v. The Commissioner of the Bermuda Police Service

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

CIVIL JURISDICTION

Ian RC Kawaley CJ

Lord Peter Goldsmith QC Mr Delroy Duncan Trott & Duncan Limited

Ms Anesta Weekes QC Mr Dantae Williams Marshall Diel & Myers Limited

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The applicant contended that his arrest on May 19 2016 and subsequent search were unlawful due to a lack of sufficient basis arguing that the exercise of summary arrest powers must be limited and justified especially under section 23(6) of PACE which the police used for the arrest

SUMMARY:

Whether the police's summary arrest power under section 23(6) of PACE is subject to limitations of 'reasonableness' and whether it was reasonably exercised in this case

OUTCOMES:

The application for judicial review was dismissed with costs awarded to the applicant

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Applicant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

Sannapareddy v. The Commissioner of the Bermuda Police Service

The applicant contended that his arrest on May 19 2016 and subsequent search were unlawful due to a lack of sufficient basis arguing that the exercise of summary arrest powers must be limited and justified especially under section 23(6) of PACE which the police used for the arrest

bottom of page