top of page
10/31/2016
START DATE
END DATE
11/14/2016
THE QUEEN -v- KAMAL WORRELL
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Court of Appeal for Bermuda
Criminal Law
Baker P Bell JA Bernard JA
Carrington Mahoney Larissa Burgess (Department of Public Prosecutions)
Arthur Hodgson (Apex Law Chambers)
FACTS OF THE CASE:
Legality of costs order against Crown Crown's conduct in prosecution. Kamal Worrell acquitted of conspiracy to defeat justice fabricating evidence and perjury after judge directed acquittal at conclusion of defence case; no costs ordered to Worrell
SUMMARY:
Acquittal refusal of costs order against Crown
OUTCOMES:
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Defendant
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
AI Chatbox Anchor
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
bottom of page