top of page

12/8/2021

START DATE

END DATE

25 January 2022

The Attorney General v. Information Commissioner

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

Public Access to Information

Shade Subair Williams J

Mr. Paul Harshaw (Canterbury Law Limited)

Mr. Craig Rothwell (Cox Hallett Wilkinson Limited)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

summary of Dispute over the Information Commissioner's authority to examine records withheld under the PATI Act following a request for access to the Brown Settlement Record

SUMMARY:

Whether the Information Commissioner has the right to examine records excluded from the PATI Act

OUTCOMES:

IC's decision to issue summonses for the production of records for examination was quashed as such records fall outside the scope of the PATI Act

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff/Claimant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

The Attorney General v. Information Commissioner

summary of Dispute over the Information Commissioner's authority to examine records withheld under the PATI Act following a request for access to the Brown Settlement Record

bottom of page