17 Augu 2023
START DATE
END DATE
25-Aug-23
The King v. Davin Kyron Thomas Dill
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Supreme Court of Bermuda
Criminal Jurisdiction
The Hon. Justice Juan P. Wolffe
Mr. Carrington Mahoney & Mr. Paul Wilson
Mr. Charles Richardson & Ms. Elizabeth Christopher
FACTS OF THE CASE:
summary of The Defendant is on trial for murder and having a bladed article in a public place. The Prosecution seeks to establish a gang rivalry motive for the murder intending to use expert gang association evidence.
SUMMARY:
Admissibility of expert gang association evidence
OUTCOMES:
Application to exclude gang evidence dismissed evidence deemed relevant for establishing motive and identity in relation to the alleged gang rivalry
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff/Claimant
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies