3/13/2014
START DATE
END DATE
16-Mar-17
LECOLIA CAINES (Trading as ?MJP Construction?) vs. SHANNON CAINES
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
The Supreme Court of Bermuda
CIVIL JURISDICTION
Registrar S. Subair Williams
Kentisha Tweed Amicus Law Chambers Limited
Sara-Ann Tucker Trott & Duncan Limited
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The case involves a claim for a liquidated sum of $20010.00 plus interest from an unpaid loan. The defendant partially admitted the claim agreeing to judgment on part of the claim being $10005.00 but disputed the rest. The plaintiff attempted to strike out the defense and sought summary judgment
SUMMARY:
Whether the defendant owes the balance of the claimed amount beyond the admitted $10005.00 and whether a legally enforceable oral loan agreement exists
OUTCOMES:
Judgment entered for $10005.00 in favor of the plaintiff for the admitted part of the claim summary judgment for the balance of the claim refused the balance to be tried
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff for the admitted claim Defendant for the balance of the claim to be tried
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies
LECOLIA CAINES (Trading as ?MJP Construction?) vs. SHANNON CAINES
The case involves a claim for a liquidated sum of $20010.00 plus interest from an unpaid loan. The defendant partially admitted the claim agreeing to judgment on part of the claim being $10005.00 but disputed the rest. The plaintiff attempted to strike out the defense and sought summary judgment