2/25/2019
START DATE
END DATE
3/15/2019
Peter Furbert v The Department of Human Resources and Information Commissioner
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Supreme Court of Bermuda
Judicial Review Public Access to Information
Hon. Chief Justice Narinder Hargun
Peter Furbert (In Person)
Gregory Howard (1st Respondent) Peter Sanderson (2nd Respondent)
FACTS OF THE CASE:
Furbert sought judicial review against the Department of Human Resources (DHR) and Information Commissioner regarding a PATI Act decision
SUMMARY:
Allegations of bad faith document accuracy and constructive dismissal by DHR
OUTCOMES:
Application for relief partially struck out limited jurisdiction of Information Commissioner in document content assessment
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Not explicitly stated
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies