top of page

1/8/2019

START DATE

END DATE

19-Feb-19

MANDAYA THOMAS -v- THE QUEEN

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Shade Subair Williams J

Mr. Marc Daniels (Marc Geoffrey Ltd)

Ms. Jaleesa Simons (On behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions)

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Mandaya Thomas a Bermudian national was convicted for the importation of acetyl fentanyl a controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972. The conviction was based on the drug being a derivative of fentanyl as per Schedule 2(e)(iv) of the Act. Thomas appealed arguing acetyl fentanyl was not a derivative of fentanyl. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal agreeing with the lower court's interpretation.

SUMMARY:

The appeal questioned whether acetyl fentanyl is legally considered a derivative of fentanyl under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972.

OUTCOMES:

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal confirming acetyl fentanyl as a derivative and controlled substance.

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Defendant

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

MANDAYA THOMAS -v- THE QUEEN

Mandaya Thomas a Bermudian national was convicted for the importation of acetyl fentanyl a controlled drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1972. The conviction was based on the drug being a derivative of fentanyl as per Schedule 2(e)(iv) of the Act. Thomas appealed arguing acetyl fentanyl was not a derivative of fentanyl. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal agreeing with the lower court's interpretation.

bottom of page