top of page

1/25/2022

START DATE

END DATE

6/7/2023

The Information Commissioner v The Attorney-General

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bermuda

Public Access to Information Civil Litigation

The President Sir Christopher Clarke Justice of Appeal Sir Maurice Kay Justice of Appeal Geoffrey Bell

Ms Monica Carss-Frisk KC Mr Warren Bank Cox Hallett Wilkinson

Mr Paul Harshaw Canterbury Law Limited

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Dispute over the Commissioner's decision to issue two summonses against the Attorney-General for refusing to produce documents requested by a reporter related to a settlement involving the Ministry of Health

SUMMARY:

Costs allocation in appeal following the Commissioner's successful challenge of a lower court ruling

OUTCOMES:

Commissioner awarded costs to be taxed on standard basis both in the appeal and lower court

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

Plaintiff/Claimant (The Information Commissioner)

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

The Information Commissioner v The Attorney-General

Dispute over the Commissioner's decision to issue two summonses against the Attorney-General for refusing to produce documents requested by a reporter related to a settlement involving the Ministry of Health

bottom of page