top of page

19-Mar-19

START DATE

END DATE

9-Nov-22

S v S

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Supreme Court of Bermuda

DIVORCE JURISDICTION

Hon. Alexandra Domingues

Mrs Georgia Marshall of Marshall Diel & Myers for the Petitioner

Mr Cameron Hill of Spencer West for the Respondent

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The Wife sought various forms of financial relief including maintenance for two children a variation of settlement for a trust (T Trust) and a property adjustment order for the former matrimonial home (FMH) which was transferred to a trust aiming to set aside this transfer under Section 41 Application. The Husband countered aiming to protect the FMH for the children by placing it into a trust arguing it wasn't a matrimonial asset for division. The court found the transfer was intended to defeat the Wife's ancillary relief claims and granted the application under Section 41 ordering the transfer set aside and costs on an indemnity basis to be borne by the Husband

SUMMARY:

InFavourOf Plaintiff/Claimant

OUTCOMES:

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

S v S

The Wife sought various forms of financial relief including maintenance for two children a variation of settlement for a trust (T Trust) and a property adjustment order for the former matrimonial home (FMH) which was transferred to a trust aiming to set aside this transfer under Section 41 Application. The Husband countered aiming to protect the FMH for the children by placing it into a trust arguing it wasn't a matrimonial asset for division. The court found the transfer was intended to defeat the Wife's ancillary relief claims and granted the application under Section 41 ordering the transfer set aside and costs on an indemnity basis to be borne by the Husband

bottom of page