top of page

19-Aug-20

START DATE

END DATE

8/27/2020

B v Y

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

The Supreme Court of Bermuda

CIVIL JURISDICTION

Hon. Chief Justice Narinder Hargun

Mr Paul Wilson (for Petitioner) Mr Adam Richards (for Respondent)

Set aside the ex parte Order

FACTS OF THE CASE:

The case focused on whether the Supreme Court could issue orders under section 36O of the Children Act 1998 for the return of a child to Bermuda and if the Petitioner fulfilled the duty of full and fair disclosure

SUMMARY:

The ex parte Order requiring the child's return was set aside. The Supreme Court found it lacked jurisdiction under section 36O to grant the order and highlighted the petitioner's failure to disclose all relevant facts

OUTCOMES:

Defendant

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary: 

pdf.png
AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies

B v Y

The case focused on whether the Supreme Court could issue orders under section 36O of the Children Act 1998 for the return of a child to Bermuda and if the Petitioner fulfilled the duty of full and fair disclosure

bottom of page