11/17/2020
START DATE
END DATE
11/20/2020
LeVeck Roberts Quincy Brangman and Khyri Smith-Williams v The Queen
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) on appeal from Supreme Court of Bermuda
Criminal Law
Justice of Appeal Sir Maurice Kay Justice of Appeal Geoffrey Bell Justice of Appeal Dame Elizabeth Gloster
Victoria Greening; Jerome Lynch QC Sara-Ann Tucker Mark Pettingill
Maria Sofianos
FACTS OF THE CASE:
Applications to reopen appeals due to recent legal developments regarding jury selection rights challenging the constitutionality of Criminal Code Amendment Act (No 2) 2020
SUMMARY:
Constitutionality of jury selection amendments equality of arms
OUTCOMES:
Leave granted to reopen three appeals
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Applicants
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies