11/20/2013

START DATE

END DATE

3/10/2014

Kader Holdings Company Limited v Desarrollo Inmobiliario Negocios Industriales de Alta Tecnologia de Hermosillo S.A. De CV

COURT:

LAW:

JUDGE(S):

CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:

DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:

Court of Appeal for Bermuda

Civil Law Contract Law

Evans J.A. Ward J.A. Bell A.J.A.

Robert Howe QC and Henry Tucker for Kader Jonathan Nash QC and Scott Pearman for Desarrollo

Appeal Allowed

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Whether Kader voluntarily submitted to Arizona jurisdiction by participating in proceedings and counterclaiming.

SUMMARY:

Appeal allowed summary judgment set aside emphasizing need for full trial to consider Kader's challenge to jurisdiction.

OUTCOMES:

Kader

RULED IN FAVOUR OF:

20 & 21 November 2013

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT

DEFENDANT:

DURATION (DAYS):

ISSUES:

RELEVANCE:

RULING:

RULING TYPE:

CASES CITED:

Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips

Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.

Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.

How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.

Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.

See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.

Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.

Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.

See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.

Download Case Summary:

AI Chatbox Anchor

Explore:

EPHESIANS 6:16

PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited

2016

RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)

2015

In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others

2007

Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies