3/3/2011
START DATE
END DATE
18-Mar-11
Kate R W Grayken v. John P Grayken
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
The Court of Appeal for Bermuda
Family Law
Edward Zacca President Anthony Evans JA Scott Baker JA
Ian Mill QC and Mrs. G. Marshall
Mr. Paul Smith and Alex Potts
FACTS OF THE CASE:
Claim for damages for breach of contract fraudulent misrepresentation negligent misrepresentation and mistake regarding asset classification in a divorce agreement
SUMMARY:
Whether proposed amendments introducing new causes of action were permissible and related to the original pleadings
OUTCOMES:
Amendments partially allowed; claims for fraudulent misrepresentation disallowed rectification and negligent misrepresentation claims allowed to some extent
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
partially both
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies