2 June 2016
START DATE
END DATE
4-Jul-16
JOSHUA BATES TRADING BERMUDA vs BRIAN HUXLEY
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Supreme Court of Bermuda
Supply of Services Act (Implied Terms) Act 2003 Sale of Goods Act 1978
Charles-Etta Simmons
Mr K. White (CH&W)
B. Huxley Respondent in person
FACTS OF THE CASE:
summary of The Respondent ordered five kitchen appliances from the Appellant. A dispute arose over one appliance not matching the order. The Appellant sued for the balance owed and the Respondent counterclaimed for the cost of the incorrect good
SUMMARY:
Whether the transaction was a supply of services or a sale of goods whether the Magistrate applied the correct law the facts around the order and delivery of the disputed appliance
OUTCOMES:
Judgment entered for the Appellant Magistrate?s judgment and award set aside Appellant awarded the original claim amount plus interest and unpaid costs
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff/Claimant (JOSHUA BATES TRADING BERMUDA)
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies