11/27/2018
START DATE
END DATE
1/9/2019
A.R.M.F v A.J.F
COURT:
LAW:
JUDGE(S):
CLAIMANT'S LAWYER:
DEFENDANT'S LAWYER:
Supreme Court of Bermuda
Divorce Jurisdiction Ancillary Relief
Justice Shade Subair Williams
Adam Richards (Marshall Diel & Meyers Limited)
Jai Pachai (Wakefield Quin Limited)
FACTS OF THE CASE:
The case involves contested applications for ancillary relief and costs following the divorce between A.R.M.F and A.J.F with disputes over the handling of matrimonial assets and costs
SUMMARY:
Applicability of costs following the event in matrimonial proceedings impact of Calderbank offers and litigation conduct
OUTCOMES:
Wife awarded 65% of her costs on a standard basis except for costs occasioned by adjournment of trial date; costs in favor of Wife on an indemnity basis for s.41 application due to Husband's dishonest litigation conduct
RULED IN FAVOUR OF:
Plaintiff/Claimant (Wife)
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT
DEFENDANT:
DURATION (DAYS):
ISSUES:
RELEVANCE:
RULING:
RULING TYPE:
CASES CITED:
Join our pro membership and get all the details at your finger tips
Want to see full case details, including key arguments and claims? [Join Pro Membership] to unlock exclusive insights.
Discover the legal strategies and defenses used in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for full access.
How long did this legal battle last, and what key events happened? [Join Pro Membership] to find out.
Uncover the critical legal principles debated in this case. [Join Pro Membership] for in-depth analysis.
See why this case matters in Banking, Mortgages, and Financial Services. [Join Pro Membership] to explore its impact.
Find out the final judgment and its legal implications. [Join Pro Membership] to access the ruling.
Understand how this judicial ruling sets a precedent in law. [Join Pro Membership] for expert breakdowns.
See how past legal precedents influenced this case. [Join Pro Membership] to unlock the list.
Download Case Summary:
Explore:
EPHESIANS 6:16
PT Satria Tirtatama Energindo v. East Asia Company Limited and Bali Energy Limited
2016
RE: C (VARIATION OF ACCESS ORDER)
2015
In the Matter of IPOC Capital Partners Limited and others
2007
Hindsight law can make mistakes. Consider checking original case studies