​

Dispute over trust and property rights poor conduct of Wanda Pedro claims of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty involvement of HSBC in a family dispute over property

Dispute over funding for an opera house project in Lucerne Switzerland and the legality of the funding arrangements

Manai Roberts pleaded guilty to possession of cannabis with intent to supply and possessing proceeds of criminal conduct arrested after fleeing police and found with drugs and cash

Darrell was convicted for sexually exploiting a young male person while in a position of trust appeal argued conviction was unsafe due to alleged insufficiency of evidence and inconsistencies in the complainant's statements

Williams challenged the requirement for employment permission as a naturalised citizen claiming it infringed on his constitutional rights

Martin Cashman a British national serving a prison sentence in Bermuda sought judicial review over parole eligibility and treatment of foreign prisoners

Dispute over beneficiary's right to access trust documents under a Bermuda trust involving the Trustee's refusal to disclose documents without the Protector's consent leading to legal proceedings by the beneficiary

Selassie was convicted of burglary and serious sexual assault from an incident on 19th January 2005 sentenced to concurrent terms of 8 and 25 years. The conviction was based on DNA evidence linking Selassie to the crime. Appeals challenged the evidence continuity handling and the judge's instructions.

Challenges to the legality rationality and procedural propriety of a police promotion decision; bias claims against ACOP Weekes; disputes over scoring and assessor qualifications in the 2018 Sergeant to Inspector promotion interview panel

Family dispute over shares and management of AK Bakri & Sons Ltd claims of unfair share distribution and dividend payment issues legal proceedings initiated in Bermuda and sought to be moved to arbitration in Saudi Arabia under Sharia law

A Jamaican national married to a Bermudian was denied parole due to potential deportation challenging the decision as discriminatory