Alleged contempt by the Commissioner of Police for breach of court orders regarding the handling and destruction of Patient Medical Files

The appellant a 15-year-old at the time of offence was sentenced to corrective training for burglary and traffic offences without a specified term later challenged for being indeterminate

Extension of the C Trust's duration from its original term to end on 17 December 3002 to accommodate dynastic planning and prevent sudden wealth impact on beneficiaries

MJM represented Apex in previous subpoena duces tecum later represented Mathew Clingerman against Apex Apex contested due to potential conflict of interest and confidentiality breach

Roberts after a long day with insufficient sleep and sustenance fell asleep while driving and caused an accident injuring Wilson. Issues: Whether Roberts? sleepy state and decision to continue driving constituted careless driving under section 37A of the RTA. Outcomes: Conviction upheld Appeal dismissed

R v. National Joint Council for the Craft of Dental Technicians (Disputes Committee) [1953] 1QB 704 Thames Water Authority v. Elmbridge DC [1983] 1 QB 570

On June 14 2013 Colonial Insurance found liable for James Thomson's negligence causing serious injuries to Kate Thomson in a 2006 accident. Contributory negligence due to not wearing a seatbelt. Issues on quantum of damages

Dispute over control and management misappropriation of funds redemption requests by shareholders potential misuse of $15 million subscription monies conflict of interest by management shareholder

Dispute over management fees following Madoff's fraud with funds overpaying fees based on inflated asset values

The case involves a defamation claim by Michael Dunkley against Marc Bean over a Facebook post on 'Bermuda Elections 2012' page alleging Bean wrote defamatory content about Dunkley being a dishonest hypocrite based on a specific 'thread' from September 30 2013

11 counts of unlicensed driving and uninsured driving fines reduced disqualification set aside appeal on disqualification's removal

The respondent claimed to be the father of 'C' and sought a paternity declaration. The Family Court initially granted leave for blood tests to determine paternity but it was contested whether the court had the jurisdiction to compel blood tests.