Dispute over the beneficial ownership of No. 1 Lemon Grove Hamilton Parish concerning a joint venture agreement to build four dwelling units on the property with both parties contributing to costs and expected to share ownership equally. The project was financed through a mortgage and further charge from the Bank of N. T. Butterfield Ltd. with both parties liable. The dispute arose when the defendant did not transfer the plaintiff's share of the property as agreed leading to legal action.

The Plaintiff a former student claims sexual exploitation by a teacher during 1998-1999. The Defendant sought to strike out the claim as statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1984. The court considered whether the action is time-barred and if discretion to disapply the limitation period should be exercised.

The case concerns a dispute over a mortgage agreement from 2004 between Benjamin Sousa and Barry Capuano with Capuano failing to meet payment obligations resulting in substantial arrears and a legal battle over the possession of the property and the exact amount owed

Brothers dispute over property sale agreement signed under duress

Failure of appellants' counsel to file written submissions on time resulting in adjournment requests

The Plaintiff claimed the Defendant was negligent for not requesting imaging of the cervical spine which would have revealed a herniated disc. The Defendant admitted to a delay in diagnosis but disputed the extent of damage caused. The court found the Defendant breached their duty by not ordering a cervical MRI on July 29 2003 which would have diagnosed the Plaintiff's condition earlier. However it was not proven that the delay caused a worse outcome for the Plaintiff but it was self-evident that the Plaintiff suffered additional pain and suffering due to the delay.

Plaintiff claimed a 10% commission from the sale of shares based on a brokerage agreement. Defendants argued the sale part of a settlement in legal proceedings did not constitute a 'sale' as per the agreement

Trustees applied for court approval of a proposed restructuring of 23 trust settlements to reorganize assets into sub-funds for different branches of a family. The application was contentious due to objections from certain beneficiaries who argued that the proposal was irrational, inadequately safeguarded minority interests, and failed to ensure long-term liquidity. The court assessed whether the proposal constituted a valid exercise of the trustees' discretion and whether it infringed the rule against perpetuities.

The Petitioner, the Husband, a Bermudian, and the Respondent, the Wife, a Brazilian, were married in 2002 and divorced in 2009 after a 7-year marriage. The Wife sought ancillary relief, including periodical payments, a lump sum, and property division. The Husband, a general physician, owned substantial assets, including a medical practice and inherited property. The Court had to determine the division of matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets and whether the Wife was entitled to a lump sum of $2 million or a lower amount.

Plaintiff suffered a degloving injury to the left foot in a motorcycle accident; liability admitted; disputes over future loss of earnings mitigation of loss past loss of earnings and appropriate award for pain and suffering

Dispute over a contract for the sale of a boat belonging to the Defendant's deceased father's estate with questions regarding binding nature of the contract and administrative powers

On 2 May 2019 Phillion Webb was convicted for dangerously driving a grey Rover overtaking two vehicles at high speed and colliding with two other vehicles driven by Annette Cowen-Godfrey and George Simmons on South Road Paget