Dispute over the existence and extent of obligations owed by LAEP to Emerging Markets leading to arbitration in Brazil and enforcement actions in Bermuda

Plaintiff claimed right of way over defendant's land based on a 1939 deed. First defendant counterclaimed challenging plaintiff's property title and asserting beneficial ownership.

Dispute over tenancy agreement and property condition

Darrell alleged racial discrimination by the Bank of Bermuda for disclosing his confidential information in 1996 leading to a loss of $3.2 million investment. A series of legal challenges followed focusing on whether the Board made a determination under the Human Rights Act 1981 and the role of institutional racism

Dispute over the execution and implications of a deed of variation for the GC Settlement including handling of specific shares from a 'mother?s fund' intended to remain within the family until a family line expires highlighted by the death of the Founder?s son

The appellant aged 24 used a piece of wood to assault an older man causing severe injury and necessitating surgery. The victim already partially disabled from a previous injury was left further incapacitated.

CPS invested in the Fund expecting to wind it up by December 31 2017. Amendments to bye-laws in 2014 removed this expectation leading to legal challenges by CPS for wrongful exclusion from voting rights on Fund's dissolution

Recognition of US Chapter 11 restructuring plan in Bermuda permanent stay on claims in Bermuda jurisdiction

Loan agreements and repayment disputes between Griffin Line and CVL extensions and disputes over repayments claims of asset dissipation

Maronie-Durham appeals against non-renewal of her Practising Certificate due to alleged professional misconduct and inadequate disclosure. The Bar Council refused renewal citing past business/financial conduct issues and nondisclosure of regulatory history. The court finds the Council's reliance on pending complaints inappropriate but identifies significant non-disclosures by Maronie-Durham as potentially dishonest

Plaintiffs claimed discrimination on disability grounds Defendants sought to strike out the action

Parties