Discrepancy between share valuations in divorce proceedings and current case Respondents seek evidence from Cayman Islands witnesses to challenge Petitioner's credibility and valuation claims

Majors Family LLC sought discharge of Interim Order court granted permanent injunction against all defendants certain defendants offered undertakings instead of continuing injunction

Anderson and Bradshaw convicted for murder and wounding with intent after a shooting incident on 24th and 26th December 2007 falsely provided alibis and evidence of gun residue and DNA linking them to the crime

Ideh an American senior manager was unfairly dismissed after a short period post-probation as Chief Operating Officer by the appellants. Tribunal awarded him compensation and back pay but appellants appealed on points of law including tribunal's failure to provide evidence notes and delay in award delivery.

John Howard Fubler Taylor's wills challenged by daughter alleging dementia impaired his capacity

Appellants entered into development agreements for the Hamilton Waterfront legislation voided agreements appellants sought compensation and challenged legislation's effect on agreements

Action stemmed from allegations of negligent breach of contract by the Bank leading to significant losses for FAC. Dispute over the recoverability of these losses and the contractual liability. Bank offered to relinquish certain shares to FAC reducing the quantum of FAC?s claim substantially leading to discontinuance of the trial.

Dispute over production orders for tax information exchange between Bermuda and Sweden focused on personal income tax on capital income for BBB and DE for 2010-2013

The appellant Denis Winslow Devent White was convicted and sentenced for sexual assault based on an incident between January 1 and December 31 2006 where he was alleged to have assaulted the complainant a child who was the daughter of his then-girlfriend. The case was reported to the police in January 2008 and tried in August 2009. The appeal was granted due to issues with the handling of delay in complaint impact of appellant's prior convictions and incorrect legal standards by the magistrate.

Morris O'Brien appealed his conviction for rape, arguing that his trial counsel failed to properly follow his instructions, did not effectively cross-examine prosecution witnesses, and used inappropriate legal terminology. He also claimed that the trial was unfair due to his counsel's failure to properly guide witnesses. The appeal questioned the fairness of the trial process and whether the defense was properly presented.

Hazel Jean Crozier a long-term Bermuda resident was induced by John G. Marshall to invest in CSIC for projects in Russia resulting in unfulfilled promises of repayment

The appellants challenged the Family Court s duty to appoint a litigation guardian and counsel for children in specified proceedings under the Children Act 1998 claiming failures in representation from 1998 to 2016 and onwards