The Scheme Companies sought court approval to convene meetings for schemes of arrangement with their creditors following litigation and opposition from certain investors. The schemes aimed to resolve pending and potential claims allowing for distributions to Scheme Creditors. After initial opposition a settlement was reached with the opposing creditors leading to improved terms for remaining Scheme Creditors.

Sensitive confidential police documents related to Bermuda Housing Corporation investigations were disclosed by media; plaintiffs sought injunction against further publication claiming breach of confidence

Appeal against Employment Tribunal decision refusal to adjourn termination of employment

Dispute between cousins over a small triangle of land (121 square feet) in the Elbow Area right of way over the Disputed Land connecting Peak Rd. and a track to Lot C historical use and access rights claimed by Plaintiff Defendant blocked access with a chain and metal rod claim for declaration of right of way and damages

Appellant convicted for attempted murder and firearms offenses; identification evidence and lawyer-client conflict highlighted

Dispute over custody and maintenance payment for a child mother ordered to pay maintenance appealed lack of reasons for decision

Kumi Harford murdered by gunshot during a gang-related shooting at least two assailants involved gangs Parkside and 42nd Street Gang Edwin Darrell witnessed Myers? involvement clothes with Myers' DNA and gunshot residue found

Plaintiff complained about noise and vibrations from neighboring desalination plant causing distress and damage

The case revolves around efforts to recover fraud proceeds linked to the Thomas Petters? Ponzi Scheme involving over US$83000000 paid to Paragon Management Ltd. The proceedings aim to trace the beneficiaries of the scheme including Steven Stevanovich through various companies and transactions

Hewey charged with premeditated murder of Randy Robinson 31 March 2011 co-defendant Jay Dill both convicted appeals dismissed conviction quashed by JCPC remitted for retrial consideration

Plaintiffs claimed damages for breach of construction contract alleging defendants failed to complete services for a fixed sum

In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled in Godwin & Deroche v Registrar-General that Bermuda?s ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. However, in 2018, Parliament passed the Domestic Partnership Act (DPA) 2018, which reversed this decision and redefined marriage as between a man and a woman. Ferguson, OutBermuda, and Jackson challenged this law, arguing it violated Section 8 (Freedom of Conscience) and Section 12 (Protection from Discrimination on the Grounds of Creed) of the Bermuda Constitution. The government argued that Parliament had the right to define marriage and that religious beliefs were not affected by the DPA. The Court ruled that the DPA unconstitutionally revoked rights and could not override established protections under the Human Rights Act 1981. The Attorney General?s Chambers Rod Attride-Stirling (ASW Law), Mark Pettingill (Chancery Legal) Provisions of the Domestic Partnership Act 2018 that revoked same-sex marriage rights declared unconstitutional Domestic Partnership Act 2018 struck down Ferguson, OutBermuda, Jackson Whether the revocation of same-sex marriage rights under the Domestic Partnership Act 2018 violated Freedom of Conscience (Section 8) and Protection from Discrimination on the basis of Creed (Section 12) under the Bermuda Constitution Landmark ruling affirming that Parliament cannot legislate in a way that imposes one group's religious beliefs over others and that removing already established same-sex marriage rights was unconstitutional Bermuda Constitution (Sections 8 and 12), Human Rights Act 1981, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) Godwin and Deroche v Registrar-General [2017] SC (Bda), R v Chehil [2014] 2 LRC 408 wix:document://v1/ugd/71f0ba_d818897f8e8c44ca80daf40da55aed4e.pdf/Judgment_20Summary-Ferguson-v-A-G-OutBermuda_20and_20Jackson-v-A-G_20_281_29.pdf