Dispute over unpaid construction work and a loan for a property in Hamilton Parish. Adjustments in claims discovery issues adjustments to the construction debt and duplication in charges led to reduced claims. The plaintiff acknowledged receiving payments that further reduced the claim amount. Disputes over specific charges and payments made directly by the defendant

APEX provided administration services for the Company under an Administration Agreement since 1 November 2011. The case involves claims of mismanagement and misappropriation of $10000000.00 invested in the M3 Fund by Goodwill allegedly directed by Mr. Ali with unauthorized payments to various entities leading to legal actions in both New York and Bermuda

Loan agreement for hotel development COH's capacity to guarantee and mortgage professional opinions COH's statutory powers

Titan Petrochemicals Group Limited (Costs) [2021]

Riley Correia appealed his conviction from the Magistrates Court for possessing drugs with intent to supply arguing for personal use

Plaintiffs were neighbors of the defendant objected to defendant's beach work leading to altercation and criminal charges against plaintiffs which were initially upheld but later quashed due to procedural errors. Plaintiffs sued for malicious prosecution alleging defendant's false complaint led to their wrongful conviction

Divorce maintenance payments misused by attorney for legal fees instead of child support

Gayle Ventures took a loan from First Bermuda Group Limited secured by a mortgage which was later assigned to Clarien Bank. Ventures ceased payments leading to legal action by Clarien to enforce the loan and mortgage. Ventures appealed against the enforcement but failed to comply with procedural requirements leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

BEST appealed against the decision dismissing its appeal against Development Applications Board decisions; Minister conceded decision flawed; dispute on EIA requirement and validity of the SDO

The Intervener claims the Bermuda Police Service breached a court order by allegedly reviewing seized materials related to a criminal investigation. The court reviewed affidavits and found no direct or indirect evidence of breach.

The claim revolves around a $27000 commission from the sale of a property named 'Purple Cow'. The plaintiff Alkon claims entitlement under a Salesman Agreement which the defendant Pond disputes citing a Termination Agreement. The property was sold to a trust beneficiary with Alkon arguing his introduction led to the sale while Pond asserts the sale post-termination nullifies Alkon's claim.

The Corporation sought judicial review against the Minister's decision to assume stewardship of its finances citing the Municipalities Act 1923. The Court dismissed the case as moot following the Minister's revocation of the stewardship decision